Mental Health Trajectories of Latinx Female Caregivers and Young Children During COVID-19: A Longitudinal Analysis.

Studies of the impact of COVID-19 on mental health symptoms suggest that there may be a unique impact of COVID-19 on minoritized individuals, young children (children five and younger), and their caregivers. Longitudinal studies with representative samples including minoritized populations are needed to accurately reflect the experience of families during COVID-19. The current study used a longitudinal design to assess trajectories of mental health among Latinx female caregivers and their young children over time, beginning prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and over the course of 12 months. In fall of 2019, Latinx female caregivers (N = 213; 93.0% biological mother) of young children (M age = 5.38, SD = 0.34) reported on their own and their child's (52.6% female) mental health symptoms, as well as parenting stress, at three time points through Fall of 2020. Growth curve models showed that self-report of caregiver global mental health worsened over time, though caregiver depression and parenting stress did not change significantly, nor did caregiver-report of their children's mental health. Results suggest that while female caregiver well-being was adversely affected by COVID-19, caregivers showed resilience in the face of this pandemic, which in turn may have buffered the impact of the pandemic on Latinx child mental health. Methodological and contextual implications of these results are considered.

Impact of COVID social distancing measures on eating and exercise behaviors among a sample of Hispanic parents of young children in the United States.

Background: In the United States, healthy behaviors, such as eating fruits/vegetables and exercise, are well below recommended levels, particularly for Hispanics. The COVID pandemic may have exacerbated existing health behavior disparities. The current study examines the impact of COVID social distancing measures on Hispanic parents' eating and exercise behaviors, and how the impact may differ by socioeconomic status (SES) and distress levels. Design and methods: This cross-sectional logistic regression study utilized data from a sample of Hispanic parents in Texas (n = 237). COVID-related questions were collected in Summer 2020. Dependent variables included self-reported changes in exercise and eating behaviors due to the pandemic (i.e. got better or got worse). Primary independent variables included family-SES, neighborhood-SES, and distress due to COVID. Results: More than half (60%) of parents reported that their eating and exercise behaviors worsened. Results showed a significant relationship between distress due to COVID and both dependent variables; changes in eating (OR = 1.38, 95% CI [1.20, 1.58]) and changes in exercise (OR = 1.28, 95% CI [1.11, 1.48]). There were no observed differences by SES. Conclusions: Results suggest distress due to COVID was associated with worsening of eating and exercise behaviors, regardless of SES. The direction of the relationship between distress and healthy eating and exercise behaviors requires further attention.

Examining School and Neighborhood Effects of Socioeconomic Status on Childhood Obesity in the U.S.

Obesity amongst Kindergartners in Texas is above the national average, particularly among Hispanic students. Research on the impact of school and neighborhood-level SES on obesity in childhood using multilevel models is lacking. Survey data were collected from Hispanic caregivers of pre-kindergarten students in Fall 2019 (n = 237). Students were clustered in thirty-two neighborhoods and twelve schools. The dependent variable was the child's body mass index z-score (BMIz). Covariates included the child's sex, primary caregiver's marital status, education level, relationship to the child, and family income. Level-two variables included neighborhood poverty and school SES. CTableross-classified multilevel linear regression models were conducted to examine the unique associations of neighborhood poverty and school SES with individual student BMIz, and how they interact. Twenty-four percent of students were classified as overweight, and five percent were classified as obese. The models resulted in a significant association between school SES and BMIz (B = −0.13; SE = 0.06; p < 0.05) and between neighborhood poverty and BMIz (B = −1.41; SE = 0.49; p < 0.01). Individual students' BMIz decreased as school SES increased and decreased as neighborhood poverty increased. Neighborhood poverty and school SES appear to play a role in the development of obesity in childhood, although in differing directions.

Association Between Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Use and Breastfeeding Duration.

Background: Breastfeeding is beneficial for both mothers and infants. Unfortunately, some infants are not breastfed for the recommended duration of time. Previous studies have identified several demographic, socioeconomic, biological, and behavioral factors that impact breastfeeding practices. Studies examining the influence of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) on breastfeeding practices are currently lacking. Materials and Methods: This population-based, cross-sectional study used data from the 2016-2018 Pregnancy Risk Assessment and Monitoring System (n = 42,827). Chi-squared tests and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: The prevalence of prenatal ENDS use was 0.9%. Only 40.8% of women who used ENDS during pregnancy breastfed for at least 3 months compared with 68.5% of women who did not use ENDS during pregnancy. In the multivariable model, the odds of breastfeeding for at least 3 months were significantly lower in women who used ENDS during pregnancy compared with those who did not use ENDS; odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.63 (0.44-0.89; p = 0.010). Conclusion: Prenatal exposure to ENDS is negatively associated with breastfeeding duration, independent of potential confounders. This finding suggests that screening for ENDS use during pregnancy can play a vital role in identifying women at-risk for suboptimal breastfeeding and offering ongoing support to improve breastfeeding practices.

A transition care coordinator model reduces hospital readmissions and costs.

BACKGROUND: The optimal structure and intensity of interventions to reduce hospital readmission remains uncertain, due in part to lack of head-to-head comparison. To address this gap, we evaluated two forms of an evidence-based, multi-component transitional care intervention. METHODS: A quasi-experimental evaluation design compared outcomes of Transition Care Coordinator (TCC) Care to Usual Care, while controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, readmission risk, and administrative factors. The study was conducted between January 1, 2013 and April 30, 2015 as a quality improvement initiative. Eligible adults (N = 7038) hospitalized with pneumonia, congestive heart failure, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were identified for program evaluation via an electronic health record algorithm. Nurse TCCs provided either a full intervention (delivered in-hospital and by post-discharge phone call) or a partial intervention (phone call only). RESULTS: A total of 762 hospitalizations with TCC Care (460 full intervention and 302 partial intervention) and 6276 with Usual Care was examined. In multivariable models, hospitalizations with TCC Care had significantly lower odds of readmission at 30 days (OR = 0.512, 95% CI 0.392 to 0.668) and 90 days (OR = 0.591, 95% CI 0.483 to 0.723). Adjusted costs were significantly lower at 30 days (difference = $3969, 95% CI $5099 to $2691) and 90 days (difference = $5684, 95% CI $7602 to $3627). The effect was similar whether patients received the full or partial intervention. CONCLUSION: An evidence-based multi-component intervention delivered by nurse TCCs reduced 30- and 90-day readmissions and associated health care costs. Lower intensity interventions delivered by telephone after discharge may have similar effectiveness to in-hospital programs.